An Interesting Outcome to Octorara Track Vote

Octorara Track and Field

The vote to approve $210,000 in spending to refurbish the Octorara Track was held at the Board of Directors’ Meeting on Sept 21st. The agenda item caused information to surface that several Board Members had been asking for almost 2 years. A last minute modification to the agenda item also added a bit of a twist, However, before all that, lets talk about current district costs, expected deficits, and the 2016-2017 Budget process. Good times, right?!

Explaining Budget vs Actual Costs

The issues of actual cost and the budget were discussed in the Finance Committee meeting. However, my first observation comes from comments made during the Track discussion. It explains a lot about our current financial situation when there are Board members who—either actually or intentionally—don’t understand the difference between budgeted costs and actual costs, or the difference between coming in under budget and coming in under revenue.

How has the District, for the last 2 years, come under budget but still ended with deficits? It is easy to come in under budget when you inflate costs on paper. As an example, if you know your actual car payment is $250 per month, but on a written budget you pencil-in a cost of $300 per month, then on paper it looks like you are doing a good job saving. This is essentially what the District has done for roughly 10 years.

What we have today is a situation where the car payment is $250, we only have $240 to pay for it, but we still are showing $300 a month on the budget. On paper, we look like we are saving. In reality, every month that goes by, we are getting farther and farther behind. Did I explain that well?

Projected Actual Costs and Deficit

The current projected actual costs for the 2015-2016 school year are expected to create a deficit of $647,472. These numbers were given to us by the Business Manager. They are also based on the current Teachers’ contract, and do not include any projected cost increases associated with any potential new contract.

Mr Curtis is also projecting 2016-2017 school year actual costs will increase by $1.5 Million, with a deficit of $1.6 Million. These projections assume only a modest increase in revenue, without a tax increase, and they again do not include assumptions about costs associated with any potential new contract.

While not specifically discussed in the meeting, we can have a reasonable expectation that taxing to the Act 1 limit will only add roughly $800,000 in revenue. If the Board decides to take that path, the actual deficit for 2016-2017 could be a around $800,000.

2016-2017 Budget Process

Beginning next month, the Policy Committee meetings will be moved to coincide with Facilities. This is to ensure that there is enough time in Budget talks, and because of the seriousness of our financial situation. There may be a few Board members who will pretend there is nothing wrong in front of a crowd of parents, in a meeting being broadcast over the internet, but come to a Finance meeting.

Based on all discussions to date, it looks like we will be attempting to keep the budget flat year-over-year. However, remember budgeted costs are not the same as actual costs. The 2015-2016 Budget was $50.7 Million. I am hoping we can achieve a $50.7 Million 2016-2017 Budget. However, the current expect actual costs for 2016-2017 are also $50.7 Million, which will be an increase of $1.5 Million over this year.

This means, while a minor victory for Octorara taxpayers, keeping the budget flat does little to keep actual costs down. We will still have a projected deficit of $1.6 Million. Taxes will still need to be taken to the Act 1 index limit, and the additional revenue will still be short roughly $800,000.

Over the last few months, there has also been talk about cutting $300,000 in personnel, with most if not all of the cuts coming from teaching positions. If this is done, in combination with tax increases, it will decrease the expected 2016-2017 deficit to around $500,000. We can then start looking at what to do about the 2017-2018 year.

Track and Field Vote

During Visitor Comments, Joan Agen spoke on behalf of the Field Development Task Force. She stated that when these talks began, the Task Force agreed that they could raise $100,000 toward the refurbishing the track. They have raised $60,000, and expect the remaining $40,000 will take 2 more years. She urged the Board to vote to approve the spending on the repairing the track. Wait, what?

These statements took at least some Board members by surprise. Over 2 years, several of us, at different times, have asked how much the Task Force believed they could raise, and how long they expected it would take. The Board members asking for this information believed it to be crucial in determining if the project was even feasible, at least they believed it was important at one time. The only person, in the end, that it really was important to was me. There is no evidence this new information influenced anyone else’s vote.

After all the discussion by the Board, what was being voted on last night was approving an expenditure up to 50% of the track cost, not to exceed $210,000. The vote would also prohibited the work from starting until the Task Force raised $134,000. The Task Force also had to commit to raising another $75,000 within 2 years of the work, in order for a protective coating to be added. The total commitment from the Task Force was expected to be $209,000, not $100,000.

I’m not going to go into all the drama of the discussion here. Free free to visit The Cube and watch the video. However, in the end, the action was modified to state the terms of the agreement expired on June 30, 2017. There was modest agreement this arrangement should not exist in perpetuity. Future Boards can always renew, but they should not have their hands tied.

The spending was approved 8 to 1. I was the lone dissenting vote.

Last week, the Facilities Chairperson recommended the Board approve spending $250,000, with the project starting this Winter, and without the Task Force fully funding their portion. This week, the Board approved spending for 50% of the project cost, not to exceed $210,000, with the work not to start until the Task Force has $134,000, and that offer expiring June 30, 2017.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 26,678 other followers


10 thoughts on “An Interesting Outcome to Octorara Track Vote

  1. I’m glad the board discussed this issue before pushing for a vote. I am not pleased with the behavior of Brian Norris and think his outburst’s at the meeting’s are childish to say the least. I think perhaps a petition to remove Brian with an election recall would be the best thing to do at this point because he appears to be a bully at these meeting’s and as a district we don’t need him to represent us in that poor manner. I’m very pleased to see the community has come together for the students, and hope that more boosters are created to help keep the heavy tax burden at bay.

  2. My wife and I attended the meeting last night. We went in with the opinion that we (the OASD) have more pressing priorities to address before resurfacing the track. Especially when you hear of potential pending tax increases. But after listening to the Task Force members, parents and athletes and seeing the efforts that they have made towards generating funds for the renovation, it was hard not to agree with them. I think adding an expiration date was the right thing to do.

    Tim, I have to commend you on your bravery. Whether you agree or disagree with Tim’s opinion, you have to admit, being the only dissenting voice in a room full of students, parents and board members and still have the courage to voice your opinion shows the kind of character that you have.

    When asked for comments, why did Ms. Bowman feel the need to stop you from making your comment only to allow other members to comment before you? Is there a seniority thing that needs to be followed if the president suspects that a rookie member may speak for a long period? I just thought it was a little weird.

    I have to agree with Joey here and say that the clearly hostile behavior of Brian Norris towards you, and I’m sure he behaves this way towards any opinion he disagrees, only shuts down debate and it’s something that shouldn’t happen. The fact that he doesn’t like that you express your opinions publicly in a blog isn’t something that should come across as negative. There are nine board members, I know of only one that has made his/her platform/thoughts/beliefs public to be openly debated. I know nothing of Mr. Norris other than he’s a hot head who dislikes cordial debate but likes raising my property taxes. Maybe he should ask you for help on building a blog so we can all learn more about his positions.

    • Absolutely, it is hard not to agree with the Track and Field parents and students. I understand they put in a lot of work, and I do want there to be a Track and Field team, but I want a lot of things that we can’t afford. The easy vote last night was to vote with the crowd.

      We don’t even know how much money we are getting from the state this year because there is not a finalized state budget. We have years of deficits and large tax increases facing us. I could not in good conscience vote for this spending knowing our current situation. Some can hope money will magically appear. I can’t.

      I was arguing for a nonbinding resolution. Some members resisted. Mr Ganow’s compromise of adding an expiration date was a good idea, even though I still could not vote for it.

      However, it all may be moot. You heard the comments from Joan Agen after the vote. The Task Force was obviously not aware of what the Board was voting on, and did not expect what happened. She stated the Task Force would need 2 years to raise $40,000. It is going to be tough for them to reach $74,000 in a year and a half.

      I’m not to the point that I start calling people out by name, but we do have people of the Board that are tax-and-spend and we do have people on the Board who take it personal when they don’t get their way. All anyone has to do is come to a few meetings and I think it is easy to figure out who is who. There are Board members who I often don’t agree with but I think are reasoned and fair minded, and there Board members who I don’t think that of. Ultimately, it is up to the voters. If they like what they got, no one needs to run and we can just keep’em in office.

      I also want to say I appreciate you and everyone coming to the meeting. It is always great to see people actually show up. 🙂

  3. My understanding of the motion regarding the track improvements was exactly as stated in the agenda from last nights school board meeting, with the Field Development Task Force needing to raise $134,000 before the Board would authorize the project. I thought there was representation from the task force present at the Worksession on Sept 14 who would have communicated this information to the entire group. It seems there is poor communication all around as well as unvetted assumptions.

    • There absolutely was poor communication, but I don’t understand how. Almost every Facilities meeting, over the 18 months, there were representatives from the Task Force. There were representatives discussing the track just last week who attended both the Facilities and Board Work Sessions Meetings. I don’t ever recall Joan Agen coming to any of these meetings, but there were representatives there to speak on behalf of the Task Force. On the other side, Nelson Stoltzfus was the Board representative at Task Force meetings, and he has gone to those meetings for years. There was more than enough two way communication.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s