Correction & Timeline Information For High School Renovation

CorrectionI want to open by making a correction to a date mentioned in the Octorara Taxpayers’ Concerns Dismissed post. It references a news article regarding residents questioning limiting the High School renovation project. The news article is from August 15, 2007, not the originally stated October 2008. This means concerned citizens were told 14 months before construction contracts where awarded and authorization given to proceed, that it was too late to change course.

The school board meeting referenced is from the August 13, 2007 Work Session Meeting. Despite the news reporting more than 50 people being at the meeting, and at least one person  speaking out with Dr Newcome responding, the official minutes did not include the comments.

Somehow, it appears, the reporter from Intelligencer Journal’s online version was able see into the future. The board meeting mentioned in the August 15, 2007 article seems to more accurately reflect the August 20, 2007 Regular Meeting, which included 118 citizens and 2 reporters. The visitor comments included many individuals voicing their concern over the ever increasing tax rates, and the possibility of losing their homes.

Mr. Mark Daddario, West Fallowfield Township, shared that his taxes have increased 15.91 mils over the past five years at a cost of $136 per week for taxes. He doesn’t oppose the renovations project, but opposes higher taxes. The district needs to find another source for funding other than the taxpayers.

Mr. Lapp of Atglen doesn’t understand the increase for taxes and wonders what can be expected in the next 6 to 10 years.

Mr. Rich Booth, West Fallowfield Township doesn’t understand the milage difference between Lancaster County residents and Chester County residents living in the Octorara Area School District. Mr. Lee responded that the fair market values set by the Pennsylvania Tax Equalization Board is different for Lancaster and Chester Counties. This is something that the district doesn’t set. Mr. Booth noted his tax increase of $900 in the last three years. Dr. Newcome shared that Mr. Lee would be glad to set up meetings with individuals to discuss the mils and how the budget is developed, anyone interested should contact Mr. Lee in the District Office.

Mr. David Nissley, Sadsbury Township, has concerns with continuing to raise taxes and questioned when it will stop. Mr. Nissley understands the renovation need, but has concerns with the continual rise in taxes.

Ms. Cuddy, Highland Township, asked if there was going to be an accounting of construction costs and where the dollars are being spent. She wanted to know what the district is planning on doing to keep the taxpayers from moving out of the area because of taxes.

Ms. Trish Underwood shared the difficulty for people on fixed incomes paying for their taxes. She feels the Board needs to be concerned with the older residents and asked that state representatives attend these meetings.

Mr. Daniel King, Sadsbury Township, discussed his tax increases. Mr. King shared that he pays $600 per month in taxes. Mr. King made some improvements to his property, but doesn’t feel this justifies his increase. He would like to set up a meeting to discuss his situation.

Mr. Kevin Stirling, Parkesburg, shared this decision is beyond the Board and asked how high his taxes can go. He asked the Board to consider what his children will do with no home to live in, but a nice school to go to because of his taxes.

Mr. Bill Snyder, Sadsbury Township, shared that he is retired and on a fixed income.

Jump ahead to August 18, 2008 Regular Work Season Meeting, and there are continued concerns about the tax rate:

Mrs. Maurice Alexander of Cochranville provided information concerning the amount of real estate taxes that they are paying the school district. Mrs. Alexander provided information that she has been married for 61 years and have raised children and have cared for foster children in the school district for a number of years. Mrs. Alexander questioned the taxes that they are paying and the possibility of the school board cutting the tax amount that they owe. Mrs. Alexander indicated that they cannot keep paying these taxes and they do not want to be in a situation that they would lose their home. Mrs. Alexander thanked the school board for the work that they do and for allowing her to make her concerns known to the school board.

The original date to award the contract, and give notice to proceed was October 2008. However, the timetable was moved up to a Special Meeting on September 22, 2008. At the September 15, 2008 Regular Meeting it is noted:

Mr. Lee reviewed information concerning the special meeting. Mr. Lee distributed copies of the proposed agenda that action would be required during the special meeting scheduled for September 22, 2008.

Ms. Bicking asked about the special meeting and if this meeting would authorize the moving forward of the project. Mr. Lee indicated that the special meeting would be for the purpose of awarding bids and authorization to proceed with the project. Mr. Ganow asked if the meeting was properly advertised. Mr. Lee indicated that the meeting has been advertised and that it should be in the newspapers September 15, 2008. Mr. Breslin indicated that he needs to feel comfortable with the alternates reviewed at tonight’s meeting. Mr. Breslin indicated that if changes are made during the special meeting, this would prevent awarding of bids and he would need to revise the bid summary for submission to the PA Department of Education.

Why was the timetable moved up, and why was there only a week’s notice given? Both the October 13th and 20th 2008 school board meetings mention only that Directors acknowledge receipt and approval of PLANCON Part F: “Construction Documents” and PLANCON Part G: “Project Accounting Based on Bids” from the PA Department of Education. No visitor comments were noted at either meeting.

Was the special meeting a way to avoid another confrontation with taxpayers?


5 thoughts on “Correction & Timeline Information For High School Renovation

  1. Keep the feet to the fire, you do have support.

    For people that have limited time to attend all the meetings (work, kids, etc..), what meeting(s) are the best ones to focus on attending? I’d like to come but I want to make sure it’s on the correct evening.


  2. I happened to notice that the ranting blog has attacked your character Tim, but we all know the real truth is here on this blog. I man named David was a borough council member years ago along with Ken, and I believe they caused so many problems that eventually they were kicked off the board from what I heard from a few residents. I can personally say that David Jones does not make the grade anywhere in Parkesburg and his words will fall on deaf ears. With that said I will say that you are making progress, and the false propaganda on that small rant blog are becoming known to all the citizens of this area.

    I would like to say thank you for your commitment to restoring the town, and putting transparency in our school board! On behalf of the people of Parkesburg we thank you and are grateful for your wise words, and knowledge on the situation we are facing.

    Over 130 people read this blog daily and have seen the truth!

    • Thanks Joey,

      I don’t take personal attacks to heart. I see it more as validation. People go negative when they know they are arguing the weaker position. They criticize solutions, but they don’t offer any of their own.

      They have fallen into the trap of pointing fingers at the local, state, and federal governments and not talking a hard look at mistakes the school district may have made, or better choices that were/are possible. If they want to argue a school district tax of 45 mills in good for the area, I would like to see them do it.

      If they think that the solution is only going to come from Harrisburg, then why are they just complaining about it? The should pursue gathering support for their ideas, and push for those things to happen… just like I am doing with my ideas… just like John McMartney is doing with his Property Tax Independence Movement. It is the whole “lead, follow, or get out of the way” mantra.

  3. Former board president Duane Hershey nixed the renovation project at an August 2007 meeting: “It’s too much for our taxpayers to handle at this point,”

    All the while, Lisa Bowman and Brian Norris were pushing for it…

    These two, who are loathe to have the public look back at decisions made in the past are now in leadership positions on the board. A huge part of the problem we have here is that the voters have been asleep at the wheel.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s